Skip to content

ZLEMA

Zero-Lag Exponential Moving Average — an EMA fed a de-lagged price series so it tracks turns with almost no group delay.

Quick reference

FieldValue
FamilyMoving Averages
Input typef64 (single close)
Output typef64
Output rangeunbounded; tracks the input price scale
Default parametersperiod is required (no default in either binding)
Warmup periodlag + period where lag = (period − 1) / 2
InterpretationLow-lag trend line; crossings of price react far sooner than a plain EMA.

Formula

lag        = (period − 1) / 2          (integer division)
de_lagged_t = 2·price_t − price_{t−lag}
ZLEMA_t     = EMA_period(de_lagged)_t

The trick (Ehlers & Way, 2010): price_t − price_{t−lag} is a momentum term. Adding it to the current price over-shoots in the direction of the recent move by exactly enough to cancel the EMA's lag. The inner EMA then smooths that de-lagged series with the usual α = 2 / (period + 1).

Parameters

NameTypeDefaultValid rangeDescription
periodusizenone>= 1EMA length. period = 0 errors with Error::PeriodZero. The lag offset is derived as (period − 1) / 2.

There is no Python #[pyo3(signature = …)] default for ZLEMA, so wickra.ZLEMA(period) requires the period explicitly. The derived lag is exposed as a read-only property.

Inputs / Outputs

From crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/zlema.rs:

rust
use wickra::{Indicator, Zlema};
// Zlema: Input = f64, Output = f64
const _: fn(&mut Zlema, f64) -> Option<f64> = <Zlema as Indicator>::update;

A single f64 close in, an Option<f64> out. Python maps this to float | None / numpy.ndarray (NaN warmup); Node to number | null / Array<number> (NaN warmup).

Warmup

Zlema::new(period).warmup_period() == lag + period. The de-lagged series is undefined until lag prior inputs exist, so it produces its first value on input lag + 1; the inner EMA then needs period de-lagged values to seed. The first non-None output therefore lands on input lag + period.

Edge cases

  • Constant series. De-lagging a constant gives the same constant (2c − c = c), so ZLEMA of a flat series is flat (constant_series_yields_the_constant pins this).
  • NaN / infinity inputs. Non-finite inputs are silently dropped: the rolling lag buffer is not advanced and the inner EMA is not fed, so the previous valid value (if any) is returned.
  • period = 1. lag = 0, the de-lagged series equals the raw price, and ZLEMA(1) degenerates to a pass-through.
  • Reset. zlema.reset() clears the lag buffer and the inner EMA.

Examples

Rust

rust
use wickra::{BatchExt, Indicator, Zlema};

fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
    let mut zlema = Zlema::new(3)?;
    let out: Vec<Option<f64>> = zlema.batch(&[1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]);
    println!("{:?}", out);
    println!("lag = {}, warmup_period = {}", zlema.lag(), zlema.warmup_period());
    Ok(())
}

Output:

[None, None, None, Some(4.0), Some(5.0)]
lag = 1, warmup_period = 4

ZLEMA(3) has lag = 1. The de-lagged series of [1,2,3,4,5] is [_, 3, 4, 5, 6]; EMA(3) of that seeds at mean(3,4,5) = 4.0, then 0.5·6 + 0.5·4 = 5.0. This matches the reference_values test in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/zlema.rs.

Python

python
import numpy as np
import wickra as ta

zlema = ta.ZLEMA(3)
print(zlema.batch(np.array([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0])))
print("lag =", zlema.lag, "warmup_period =", zlema.warmup_period())

Output:

[nan nan nan  4.  5.]
lag = 1 warmup_period = 4

Node

javascript
const ta = require('wickra');
const zlema = new ta.ZLEMA(3);
console.log(zlema.batch([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]));
console.log('warmupPeriod:', zlema.warmupPeriod());

Output:

[ NaN, NaN, NaN, 4, 5 ]
warmupPeriod: 4

Interpretation

Zlema is a low-lag trend line. Use it where an Ema would lag too much into a reversal — for example as the fast leg of a crossover system, or as a trailing reference that should react quickly. The momentum injection that removes the lag also makes Zlema overshoot on sharp spikes, so it is noisier than the Ema it is built on; pair it with a slower filter if whipsaws are a concern.

Common pitfalls

  • Expecting Ema-identical values. Zlema is deliberately not an Ema — it leads price. The two only coincide for period = 1.
  • Forgetting the extra warmup. Warmup is lag + period, not period; budget (period − 1) / 2 extra bars before the first output.

References

John Ehlers and Ric Way, "Zero Lag (Well, Almost)", Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities (2010). The implementation here uses the standard lag = (period − 1) / 2 and an SMA-seeded inner EMA.

See also